KEHADHIRAN PENDENGAR YANG RAMAI BUKANNYA SUATU TIKET YANG MENJAMIN KEMENANGAN PAKATAN RAKYAT!
Pakatan Rakyat boleh dikatakan sentiasa menjuarai setiap program ceramah yang diadakan oleh mereka. Kehadiran orang ramai dalam ceramah-ceramah yang diadakan oleh BN/UMNO tidak pernah dapat mengatasi bilangan kehadiran orang ramai di dalam ceramah-ceramah anjuran PR.

Contoh yang paling terkini, di Hulu Selangor baru-baru ini program ceramah dari PR mendapat sambutan yang jauh lebih hebat dari BN walaupun Najib sendiri sebagai PM turun bersama Dr. Mahathir mantan PM. Dalam bab ini, kita sentiasa menang.

Mana boleh ceramah PKR ramai. Ini mesti PKR tipuuu
Namun demikian, bilangan kehadiran orang ramai di dalam ceramah-ceramah anjuran PR tidak boleh dijadikan sebagai petunjuk, yang ianya akan memberi kemenangan akhirnya? Ianya tidak dapat dijadikan sebagai petunjuk yang pengundi-pengundi akan mengundi Pakatan Rakyat!

Jika di era 70 an dan 80 an ianya boleh dijadikan sebagai petunjuk yang mungkin menjadi kenyataan, tetapi kini di zaman sekarang ini, yang mana pengundi-pengundi bersikap terbuka dan bersedia mendengar apa sahaja dari kedua-dua belah pihak, maka bilangan kehadhiran orang ramai dalam ceramah-ceramah yang diadakan tidak boleh lagi dijadikan petunjuk!
Dan dengan itu sandaran terhadap bilangan kehadhiran orang ramai dalam ceramah-ceramah sebagai petunjuk kemungkinan memenangi sesuatu pilihanraya itu perlulah di kaji semula.
Jika dilihat berdasarkan pengalaman pilihanraya-pilihanraya yang lepas, kehadiran orang ramai di dalam ceramah PR terutamanya sewaktu kempen pilihanraya adalah disumbangkan oleh kedatangan penyokong-penyokong dari luar. Oleh yang demikian, ianya tidak dapat dijadikan sebagai petunjuk yang pengundi-pengundi akan mengundi Pakatan Rakyat! Ini adalah kerana mereka itu bukannya pengundi-pengundi tetapi orang luar!
Mungkin pengundi-pengundi yang sebenar kehadhirannya tidak seberapa dan bilangannya tidak dapat dikesan. Oleh itu keberkesanannya sebagai faktor untuk kemenangan sesuatu pilihanraya itu tidak dapat diterima! Oleh itu kerapkali keputusan pilihanraya adalah bertentangan dengan bilangan kehadhiran orang ramai dalam ceramah-ceramah yang dianjurkan.

Mungkin juga kaedah menyampaikan ceramah kepada hadhirin bukanlah cara yang berkesan untuk menarik pengundi-pengundi menyokong Pakatan Rakyat. Maka seharusnya Pakatan Rakyat memikirkan kaedah lain yang lebih berkesan dan dapat diterima oleh para pengundi.
Oleh itu seharusnya Pakatan Rakyat menggunakan kaedah mendekati dan memahami kehendak bakal-bakal pengundi dengan cara berkempen dari rumah ke rumah yang WAJIB diketuai oleh pemimpin besar sekurang-kurangnya MP atau Adun dari PR perlu turun bersama sepanjang tempoh berkempen. Begitu juga dengan sistem keluarga angkat.
Dengan cara itu, barulah pemimpin-pemimpin PAS DAN PAKATAN RAKYAT dapat memahami masalah dan kehendak-kehendak bakal pengundi, bukannya syok sendiri! Dengan itu barulah orang-orang kampung merasa mereka dihargai dan pandangan mereka, pendapat mereka didengari dan barulah terasa hubungan rapat dengan bakal pengundi disesuatu kawasan itu!
Setiap kumpulan mestilah diketuai oleh pemimpin besar ini agar setiap kempen atau hujah boleh diberikan dengan betul dan tepat. Ada juga kemungkinan sebelum ini terdapat jentera kempen yang hanya diwakili oleh pimpinan bawahan tidak mampu untuk menerangkan isu-isu besar atau melawan hujah-hujah yang mungkin dikemukakan oleh pengundi.
Pemimpin-pemimpin besar di dalam PR tidak lagi boleh hadir berkempen di bawah-bawah khemah untuk memberikan ceramah sahaja. Mereka perlu turun setiap hari menemui pengundi-pengundi yang dikenalpasti pendokong tegar UMNO/BN.
PR juga mesti aktif di dalam mengadakan aktiviti masyarakat. Aktiviti seperti bersukan, ramah mesra, sesi soal jawab, sessi menyuarakan pandangan dan pendapat rakyat setempat dan kadangkala berhibur sedikit dengan hiburan tradisional yang tidak melalaikan dan banyak lagi aktiviti sepatutnya menjadi satu kemestian untuk menjalin hubungan yang erat dan boleh mendekatkan PAS dan Pakatan Rakyat kepada pengundi-pengundi atas pagar yang belum lagi membuat keputusan dan sentiasa menilai aktiviti-aktiviti yang dilakukan oleh kedua-dua pihak yang mengambil bahagian dalam pilihanraya.
Ingatlah, bilangan atas pagar dan golongan yang diam tidak menyatakan apa-apa itu terlalu banyak bilangannya. Oleh itu dekatilah mereka, bermesaralah dengan mereka, barulah PAS dan Pakatan Rakyat akan mendapat undi mereka.
Tentang golongan pengikut tegar pula, tidak banyak yang dapat dibuat oleh Pas dan Pakatan Rakyat untuk mengubah pemikiran mereka. Ini adalah kerana kebanyakan daripada mereka sudah menjadi sebati darah daging mereka dengan idea dan pemikiran BN.Apatah lagi, mereka juga sering disajikan dengan laporan -laporan negatif dan tidak baik mengenai pembangkang dari media seperti TV1 dan Utusan Melayu.
Tetapi pendekatan pemimpin-pemimpin PAS dan Pakatan Rakyat menghampiri penduduk setempat memungkin mereka itu berubah dan simpati terhadap perjuangan PAS dan Pakatan Rakyat. walaupun bilangan kemungkinan yang akan berubah itu sedikit, ianya sudah lebih dari mencukupi, maklumlah mereka itu penyokong tegar!
Tetapi pendekatan seperti itu pasti dapat menarik sebilangan besar pengundi atas pagar dan pengundi yang diam tak bersuara. Itu yang pentingnya. Sebaliknya kehadhiran pengundi-pengundi atas pagar dan pengundi-pengundi yang diam didalam ceramah tidak menjanjikan apa-apa. Anda akan mendapat sokongan mereka andainya anda sebagai pemimpin-pemimpin PAS dan Pakatan Rakyat mendekati mereka di kampung mereka sendiri apatah lagi jika dirumah mereka sendiri.
Oleh itu, maklumat mengenai pengundi-pengundi atas pagar dan pengundi-pengundi yang diamdi sesuatu kawasan itu perlulah dikemaskini dari masa kesemasa. Dekatilah mereka. Hampirilah mereka, Dengarlah pandangan dan pendapat mereka. Mereka itu rakyat majoriti yang tidak bergiat dalam parti.
Mudah-mudahan PAS dan Pakatan Rakyat sedar bahawa mereka bukan lagi berada di zaman 70 dan 80 an lagi. Semuanya sudah berubah. Oleh itu pendekatan baru mendekati pengundi-pengundi juga memerlukan perubahan, pendekatan baru di alaf baru.
Jika PAS dan Pakatan Rakyat masih lagi bergantung kepada cara lama, kaedah lama, maka besarlah kemungkinan usaha dan tenaga yang anda keluarkan itu tidak mendapat sambutan dan seterusnya mengalami kekalahan satu demi satu. Sebenarnya banyak lagi cara untuk PAS dan Pakatan Rakyat mendapat sokongan rakyat. Tetapi takkan pula kami rayat majoriti yang tidak bergiat dalam parti ini yang perlu memikirkan dan mencadangkannya kepada anda, pemimpin-pemimpin parti!
MAY 2 — The Barisan Nasional won the Hulu Selangor parliamentary seat last Sunday.
The election victory was supposed to be a foregone conclusion as the constituency is nestled in the middle of the Umno rural heartland of southern Perak and northern Selangor where the party grassroots machinery is formidable and the Pakatan Rakyat branch network is sparse.
After all, the constituency was neglected by Pakatan since March 2008.
Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), the diminishing lead partner in the Pakatan coalition mislead the public in Hulu Selangor by fielding the late Datuk Dr Zainal Abidin Ahmad as he hid his terminal cancer illness from the people of Hulu Selangor when chosen to contest the seat.
This time, PKR decided to fool the voters of Hulu Selangor and offered change by fielding Datuk Zaid Ibrahim — a former Umno warlord, cabinet minister, millionaire and main beneficiary of Umno’s affirmative policy as a corporate lawyer.
The Pakatan government in Selangor had not done much in terms of service and development in Hulu Selangor since it was elected in March 2008.
Selangor is led by Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim, a political novice in running government and political campaigns and is rumoured to be aloof and treats his fellow politicians like staff in the companies he used to head courtesy of Umno’s affirmative policy.
Tan Sri Khalid’s weak leadership was compounded by the clear conflicts between the PKR and its coalition partners PAS and DAP in the spearheading the campaign machinery.
The fact that BN candidate P. Kamalanathan won did not surprise me. But his narrow majority of 1,725 votes has triggered my greatest fear.
There are a couple of conclusions that can be drawn from the election that has me concerned.
First, the election has revealed the weakness of the BN coalition partners and exposed their decimated grassroot capabilities. They do not have strength on the ground and are totally dependent on the Umno machinery!
Thus their contribution to attract support from the non-Malay community was negligible. Second, Umno can no longer depend on generational filial piety to guarantee unconditional support from the Malays.
The traditional chain of support generated from the grandfather demanding their sons and grandchildren support Umno to protect their interests has broken down. The reverse is now happening where the young, the city-based grandchildren fuelled by the “Hate Umno and BN” campaign by Pakatan, are returning home to turn the elders against Umno and BN.
Third, Pakatan has done extremely well to perpetuate “anything but Umno and BN” campaign. The sustained attack on corruption has weakened the credibility of Umno and BN.
The tables have now been turned where the opposition are now able to field “driftwood” in any constituency and still garner substantial votes, previously the norm for BN.
The failed candidacy of Zaid Ibrahim is a case in point. He is an outsider, a cosmopolitan candidate unsuitable for a rural constituency and as a Muslim who admitted to career-killing moral political baggage. Yet, he still received 48 per cent of the overall vote.
That is not as surprising as he took 37 per cent of the Malay vote despite the negative attack on his morality and the very visible ultra Malay campaign by Perkasa. I expected that the all or nothing Malay-centric strategy would be able to attract 80 percent of the Malay vote, a norm for an Umno stronghold.
The fact that that BN managed to get only 63 per cent of the votes is alarming. Maybe Pakatan has finally managed to get Umno members to hate Umno.
Fourth, it is very clear that the Umno leadership and members in the states where we lost power are unable to respond to the new role as opposition. They are still lulled into a false sense of security that the people will not accept Pakatan as a viable government because of its incongruent party structure.
They forget that the people want an alternative in government. They are attracted to the idea of a two party system to achieve that goal. They forget that they still need to work hard and deliver the service that would endear the public to them.
The close result in Hulu Selangor has exposed the weakness of Umno there.
The late Datuk Zainal was too sick to work and lead the party and offered little resistance to Umno. The local party had two years to work and regain support from the voters, Malay or non-Malay there.
The truth is they did not work to capitalize on that advantage and I would not bet on BN retaining the seat.
PENDAPAT YANG LAIN/ ANOTHER VIEW

PKR ran a close against BN by riding on its partners’ shoulders. — file pic
By Syed Jaymal Zahiid KUALA LUMPUR, April 30 — PKR might be seen as the lynchpin for Pakatan Rakyat (PR) but last Sunday’s Hulu Selangor by-election has revealed its partners to be equally effective as the pact’s driving force.
PKR put up Datuk Zaid Ibrahim as the candidate, promoting his national stature in all their campaigns, but lost to MIC’s P. Kamalanathan, who was voted in with a 1,725-vote majority on mainly Malay and Indian support.
While PKR’s campaign was marred by news of party members defecting almost on a daily basis, both PAS and the DAP remained solid in terms of both supporter loyalty and organisational prowess.
It is understood that contrary to denials by PKR leaders that the defections were of no impact to its campaign, the resignation of one of its leaders — Hulu Selangor PKR division treasurer, Dr Halili Rahmat — had almost brought the party’s machinery to a total halt.
“For PAS, the campaign was organised in three waves. For the first wave, it was generally agreed that PKR would handle it entirely,” a PAS official told The Malaysian Insider on condition of anonymity.
“Our observation indicated PKR was in a mess. The resignation of Halili had almost paralysed them as he was influential there and also the purse stringer.
“It was only when we came in, at the second wave, that PR’s machinery begin to move especially in the Malay areas,” he added.
The PAS official revealed that PKR had no virtually no network on the ground in Hulu Selangor. It had but a single branch in each voting zones whereas PAS, despite being the outsiders, had three branches working for each polling zone.
“Even so, their branches were virtually ineffective, and we had to go in and give them a help. If not, God knows...” added the source.
Innuendos pointing to PKR’s ineffective campaign were everywhere.
PAS secretary-general Datuk Mustapha Ali had recently said, “I don't mean to belittle PKR but it was our machinery that worked hard to campaign in the Malay areas”.
Another was Klang DAP MP, Charles Santiago, who was on PR’s campaign trail throughout the by-election. He had blamed the inefficiency of PKR’s machinery, among others, as cause for their defeat.
This was admitted by party elections director, Fuziah Salleh, who pointed to the “lack of competence and experience on the part of the local level leaders” to handle the massive by-election.
This flagging performance was also blamed on the splits within PKR’s machinery. It is understood that the machinery was divided into three camps: one of Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim who was hand-picked to lead the campaign; the second, of vice-president Azmin Ali; while the Hulu Selangor candidate himself, Datuk Zaid Ibrahim, wielded the third.
“So what this shows is that, even at the most crucial of times, PKR cannot put aside its differences. Are we betting that they would in the future? After Hulu Selangor, it looks unlikely,” said another PAS leader who did not want to be named.
Fuziah, however, denied that their machinery was divided, saying it had instead brought the allegedly warring leaders like Azmin, Khalid and Zaid together.
Another key element missing within PKR is its ideological strength said the PAS leader further. Other parties, the leader contended, have their unique “element” to keep the party intact except for PKR.
“BN’s support have always relied on money. That is their ‘element’. For PAS, we have Islam and the concept of loyalty and discipline. That is what holds us together. I don’t know what DAP has but it seems to be working. Only PKR is hit with desertions. I don't see what are the ‘elements’ that hold PKR together,” said the PAS source.
This view is generally shared by political observers, who noted that PKR has yet to project a solid ideological image apart from its enmity towards its rivals, BN.
In the meantime, PKR is betting only on the frail consensus that its de facto leader, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, is accepted by both PAS and DAP as a possible prime minister should PR take over federal power.